Oh, I get it, fig 3 is just only very slightly different from 1, I didn't at all get what it was supposed to show on first look.
I agree that the long titles will be very challenging. If you can, try cranking up the font size on your mock-up and see how it looks.
In figure 2, the buttons are visual noise. Not readable at all. I get why you made them buttons, because it changes the info on the page, not links to another page, but that is too much chrome to information. The all button is redundant. Make the heading a link with the total fandoms shown and you've just cut a bunch of links (that all have the same name, which is a big accessibility no-no) off the page.
In figure 3, I agree with the other poster who said that reminds them of the Tag pages. This is not a good thing. There's so much space taken up in each box with detail that likely should be confined to the fandom page. That would be horrible to scroll on a small device width and/or large font size view.
Less is more. I realize the archive style is "there's no such thing as too much bling", but when you're giving users a page they will scan for information, that chrome just becomes distracting and works against what you are trying to provide.
It will definitely be possible to browse a listing of all the fandoms with your chosen attributes. We thank you for the feedback on the design of the submedia landing pages and the buttons; we will take it into account when the interface is coded.
Comment on Call for Feedback on Category Change Proposal
Nonny Quixote (Guest) Wed 18 Sep 2013 06:45PM UTC
Comment Actions
LadyOscar (Category_Change_Workgroup) Thu 19 Sep 2013 04:43PM UTC
Comment Actions